Very intuitive interface that doesn't need any prior adaptation time.With a very powerful algorithm, speed up your tasks and work smarter and faster. – And yes VBA, VB, C#, python,… could do automation between BIM and CAD file, but why people(ware) didn’t plan and hadn’t empathy, compassion or stick to the BEP, crystal clear design contract to enforce/respect every parties to follow the agreement.SpeedJoin for Autodesk® Revit® is a minimalist Addin that helps users to do in just three clicks what normally took hundreds of clicks and a lot of time. Let try to imagine when local designer need to change a block 100 sheets in 100 files and different folder with long layer name. If someone has experience both platform, you would be known what the crazy things punch to stomach at lower part. – Another peaken one, lead design firm has still right 100% in their design and modeling asset every single element, they just export to be CAD File “Every single sheet for single file”. They just looked at surreal work breakdown schedule and save their time and budget. These’re fake and freak BIM Method with unnecessary pressure for operation. Every time! when Lead designer updates design progress whether weekly or …as per owner’s request, local designer will be always updating model ver.2018 to 2019 before compare model changes…checking with interoperability. Moreover, Lead designer use Microstation and transfer to Revit 2018, but the owner need local designer to use lastest version as 2019. – Project owner hired Foreign Design firm to design for them, and then having an instruction to the local designers each discipline to do parallelly such Lead designer firm stay in Prelim/DD 50% stage but the owner need! Tender package from local designer when Lead designer submit only 100% DD.
REVIT WALL JOIN PROBLEMS WINDOWS
Now, if there was a way to create windows with an interface like the CW tool, sign me up! I’ll take the documentation hassle over the modeling hassle any day. Commercially, we generally use storefront for punched openings anyway. But for me, 9.5 times out of 10 the CW tool is the way to go. Those windows will also have to be a true punched opening. The only time I’d use a window family is if I know that a specific window manufacturer will be used and they provide quality Revit families for their products.
If you don’t properly use grouping and CW types, you can’t accurately expect windows that should be the same size to be consistent.
However, using the CW tool does create more difficulty with it comes to documenting common window sizes/configurations. The time it takes to create a custom window family, especially one that is parametric, to give you the look/layout a design requires, is a family modeling nightmare and I’ve yet to see a window family that gives you the creative flexibility that the CW tool provides. Certainly when it comes to sloped windows, or various mullion configurations, or different glazing options the CW tool saves a huge amount of time.
This is clearly realized during design when a building’s window layout will constantly be changing. The CW tool for windows is so much easier and more flexible than creating window families.
0 kommentar(er)
